assembly - Shouldn't R3 hold address x3307? -


i doing practice question question 7 enter image description here

shouldn't address highlighted x3307, not x3308?

the way reasoned out (pc before 2nd instruction) = (pc after 1st instruction).

the pc after 1st instruction x3301. therefore when second instruction executes, pc, x3301 incremented 6 x3307.

does agree? or did miss , r3 should store x3308?

pc-relative offsets applied on top of incremented pc, "after" value of pc, or in other words, address of following instruction.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IF statement in MySQL trigger -

c++ - What does MSC in "// appease MSC" comments mean? -

android - MPAndroidChart - How to add Annotations or images to the chart -